why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAFKAOMVFTV3MLR3YX4VAOQXZLKI3M5IF3E5XI3MYL4Z5QB7PTJBCISC, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAFKAOMVFTV3MLR3YX4VAOQXZLKI3M5IF3E5XI3MYL4Z5QB7PTJBCISC is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 31242f0bbfe070cb3dcc92d1e69aafa0a28cea51edfafc5ba8b90e49011f85ce
- request
- 71317da9e4d0c11e90fb785225e8e64812ff74c33058e931abd9198c3041c524
- transaction
- feef3e5bff2d7e44fe81b44d20cca66417f418dab5826f0e108d3f3273fcbd94computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 24823
the chainentry 24823
- sealed to the entry before
- 3d6256c507c0b90868000eb964c545085feffb456debb617b0f494716bb19b73
- this leaf
- 5f39530b652c3185ad835c4b377dab804167d0eccf33c92bfd4eb788d807ad64
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- KS0D9R+0gG+MO9itjAAJS7XGCXW2xyUQJ/aCxXtgV4C0ocjSefSSvlMMMcaW6GsdpJULTGUXrN04dLAf792eAg==