why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCSDADPQWH5YDPIM633DYG6GRJ3SYM7RQEQQCACVVFXEUN2KREXZ576J, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCSDADPQWH5YDPIM633DYG6GRJ3SYM7RQEQQCACVVFXEUN2KREXZ576J is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 5c369919ec3a3ffe6873bf83faab67e518b932418a98cef2a121c21123bb9259
- request
- 250f27a96fe2cbb56b259a9d7820e31ea5a0a4edebfda4d85193e4c51f7d8323
- transaction
- f71fb74620cc0b8480e905a4c2c7e43ef00a5df05e2ac65fc431c82ff0f1298bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35887
the chainentry 35887
- sealed to the entry before
- cc487f232dc6a8d6531b5d2bb732a0bbfd35b03c17a23766fda20cd30251d734
- this leaf
- 6026a51e4a2f1bfe4af74b1c97744d5fa82ed3ada930bda3814f003a36a9b1ad
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +UTNj/Xh36hUW4dhWJEkBSL/65s6cQkSz3V9XM6BEhN8Ulbf8gIZNGFXw31ijHhVyho+dCAby/X+bWjjxVnhAw==