why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBQJX74ADDC2WSB2WLELLVD65AQOAD5ICNPA4P4UZPJ7RD7QA4O3L7XX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9d775e3ecd6937212d798d9b0da859e5748abbc4f0d5c660e74913405b5a27aa
- request
- e5409602333b981ea4dfb34a19116d57e3236d3564a8e95ec827536442df384a
- transaction
- 16ce5607ff6200d1983bb0e8d7872ef1d654bbdf0e724cf4fe655a3c897265fccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3369
the chainentry 3369
- sealed to the entry before
- 2a1e7051d5056360688b510aa49a13b336efb5b91a50d5c0e70addd07ba9e0c7
- this leaf
- 603012611589f3f6ec929bed114ba01704a6cb7c9246a49001f2012910d24929
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- jn8WK5rLwFFjbM1bwPo7u44iZCQs7+E7t/0K7MF6wrMQjN2AZn2nMuv5IkqIQwV/fxqY02+1GiGmuCxEP+P5AQ==