why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAT5TG3KPO7EWYJMHGX7CBCIWEAVMAFSGIOFWML3PYHV7VBOM7VI7WIZ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dca1d472c2edf173df06baf19aab06bb817a7e85f9633bff0758d4fb0ac88401
- request
- dd08f22556f744abf696b069b01c33da10a4f08754dc52afc4d581717815043e
- transaction
- 90e84683982dfa9eae82a8c55c96119db97e73a243a9bd25a890e859a1f78adfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 22984
the chainentry 22984
- sealed to the entry before
- 023fb039cc6b3479aabf93523c2ace36638ab56243c2b5690e45b7c3d44ee88c
- this leaf
- 605e7f1f1fe3c3e68c29e87dfdafc0d0445650ce2c8e9bad15d7384a73790ba3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- D01FxkFqh9LfVz8N6QnxNaXkPYyVPlN9qkppcfliS295eahbUOJykvVFxccWX1mAURh4ryzSzzfa4seMQ0rkDw==