why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCLZMA3PL2ESAZU4YE6M2C35CROVEYY4KOMTQUUF35NJWXYW53W3BHMO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- bd0826795e7be1707fdca28b3c15ec98f4f8bfb97c51f09ecfba40793dc5b69d
- request
- 5daf2cc4cdee2630f566e5062e9c0f3b7b7bfab62669fa92b41fa89deea1c577
- transaction
- c5263314ef8a3dd703e37a1ab6e66350489a7df46311dfe1f185d60f5b38342ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 69037
the chainentry 69037
- sealed to the entry before
- f12bf12a07b20baa41153c7ea2f107f7f2c3d6e7a58e35549e3ca996bbfc1987
- this leaf
- 607add30d67fa264798eb860c236b875aea75438ba6461101d2d4bd1ab428480
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- N6zzUm+s7qvEgeE/KvOLF8X825ci1ZaKTe2+hx1n6Pq5AYwxO+hiZ6RjuBwSztT+yaJGYDiWRCyEyVpVDyhQDA==