why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GB5A5DJJKCDE6H6ML2H5BSOC7K34BA7NMGU5JZVTADKCXLX2RJMXP65N to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1517e780c26e24870223945a6cc3df97cc508c1c4c5139d946b5affaf52d9caf
- request
- 72e34584108a3e589d85dad67767476c49498f9c9d7fb00a9dce7f4391d8c37f
- transaction
- a56dfc3b26212b0a6ff12ac7bded1092ab0b6bdc240e749af9c5ecda2aa93388computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7487
the chainentry 7487
- sealed to the entry before
- f42063581d9bcfd1fb91a4f2ed7969c72ef566d4fa164c6be134390fdad9e958
- this leaf
- 610fcef61df2b5a9b041f893970c31fb9b36ff604ac6ef71a6a8d1227d55bff2
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- CEXHrQoH0ejK7JpYt7oiaYkq0fBuHl9w7U+yqQjkspdKqxXSM1a1wV8y6VCm4rAMMMnXzDIzJWOxAtCAcoIXDw==