why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAMQN6MVSQOEICYKBLADECWSAZSPKCDFLIB2PZSOEDYTB3ND25NFESR3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 4fe732deeae531f3d6ad0644bba2d24d50e3ef61046bbdc2ee11f3f3fb6b3f7f
- request
- 1b63f598554cdf1ae48f0986bd61f2266033e2c2f4e5db4d817734740442449e
- transaction
- dd4d5baff51b34cc1cf83a2b02baba4a08e02ce7476211427d72c6e18f3e81dacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 55326
the chainentry 55326
- sealed to the entry before
- 2504016446d73fe60e4208261d537c3a96d583aba954eefd14e408579cc31bdc
- this leaf
- 616293354ddb65be71a5cc1f5052d762a33d751cedf641dda739ce2ac5d9218c
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 9vl0Ih3TudgHj3OuKNvm6cz01UEcRf6dEc9dHJjsk4sSzKX612uqMEn8FiOrQy/a9VLBmoNjBh96i3Zwe4tWCA==