why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAT5EK7XECUVGBJBSKBZIFML5AQMXC2YOX4DHF5WXHAS62FLNNAB2GQC, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAT5EK7XECUVGBJBSKBZIFML5AQMXC2YOX4DHF5WXHAS62FLNNAB2GQC is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- eec0b3fe0599dbb59b3a268d19ef911f3efa94055ff48819ec24e2f651c9258c
- request
- 74a16b8e69a41762117dd770d3f910a35b1e02a1ad7d40f05c3142810297a607
- transaction
- 1295f63be79a16bc5674162cb3e5d7865bbc73d5695d443bd9d196c54e923e40computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1158
the chainentry 1158
- sealed to the entry before
- 3aaa616e0a63740b27bf60959e9dd22872b31bfbb308564fe20c15fa0dda00ad
- this leaf
- 628943934f4238dbc02d01e7a66abb512eb3c562bc6c64064baf2b701b568d0a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 4QEgrYjy7uvAeO15OOXVfH5UaC45UvlNb7tIDJvQOrLeo3VntbaE9SphzJjEi5QlDv4TQ3AsfGTRBARrX9MBDA==