why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GD5OLQU23W7H4NDDD4OOOATNQ7DMVXBBH3KYKCMSIWSTJW3UDNHG2H7I to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a250417471af168a61c2fae83ecf8ff13b4014283808c80758bce6e55f004de4
- request
- 8d0e72b39977ed28a40f59704abb2a1d6d11e81d66a241c4ed4d509491fc82aa
- transaction
- 126cadbc9e0161e0cdd87e8ebe4c7f903ecf66b1142080b4602f2454c08deefbcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 39641
the chainentry 39641
- sealed to the entry before
- 05ce007006f674bb8d8249ee6c9803dfaf01e4f971c4bbd9767cb4caec259c6d
- this leaf
- 635f5f3624e454e460a3c8d7787d0e9238d8d6584237f00fe3df2a227590e025
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- A6PnXJrov4IPGAC4fhaoWdln/NTJMnRhyrl9BptN28ahJcr1FjyxLbWO1Js+rpLPApfSamgMrnR5MounNteQBw==