why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBCVYZKYVXSJ5O64I4FUL7IMIU2PAONCQ5OMPIUM4MC4UQP73SNMDYGJ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- ba50ad02e1d450dd38379f48fe2d0b571ce9abcab05bc935db04e7b16a999caa
- request
- b3d9efd899ace6c00a05b87d4b61a5e82de9e8aeed2c5e5939e0ab04e8a244f4
- transaction
- be5049b7f0acc69bd569970b19e6a2776c24112c8c82738df1234c68ac6a1c8acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 9279
the chainentry 9279
- sealed to the entry before
- 61625c240916dad1439207d520fcbec4554a56b25f33132f4cea9cd0ab753ac5
- this leaf
- 638e8083d047593e6091651e0fc28036aa426e5f8192e9719c355f28bcdddeef
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- v/V20Am0vonKpMudYDh+UFfzlhu+b70PAU7vlajXWq/U1p/GzmEVhM19DFlYoiLAZjpOyGKvjzVc7VWjtQ7eBA==