why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBQL3EXNUN6MMBHXIX45FI7Q672VX6BK27TRMB32RFQRU3O5SJVPQSLV, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBQL3EXNUN6MMBHXIX45FI7Q672VX6BK27TRMB32RFQRU3O5SJVPQSLV is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e65de51634589de45a2b23d7cc14185e665d8c246bef995bb24a274864d6cac8
- request
- 2910571b14d65bfaf0d1cac8ab43edfeecdb0a3451a8ebfd35ff5e70b7f75f4c
- transaction
- 62385156206d12d9f8392e335b7f1e3c51a6530a6c09bf8cba73f22a3a5babbfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 27168
the chainentry 27168
- sealed to the entry before
- 05012130dc04c3ce1d7dd25c30ca63e99de62772542ec3db8854bb7ee7b90053
- this leaf
- 639681af1e957b1683675e76d6e1e8ad5a29f3007da47b43f0e1111caf075d3d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- E4cFzAyLM+ENwND2XaiMhygJujCdQy84mgA08zx60WkJe/+C/YGrImooJN7Uup0adJTbkvundtPnVYVQtJHfCg==