livelog 17,594 entries · root 28cf5a32a735 · read 04:17:38
the record/entry 17085
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDSIHGSKBG3TPK57UDSZMXSCDVDLLZPQHVYZO2RCBYSRCKOCRBF463BE to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.392ms2026-08-21 18:52:29
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDSIHGSKBG3TPK57UDSZMXSCDVDLLZPQHVYZO2RCBYSRCKOCRBF463BE to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
7c360bf1b38d35b2ecb3f6e0e087e6b524313a127150d6f8e414b07d021bd641
request
c6f2a53595b5ac57a07e8a45e6c9272a153ad3fd6064e37530c23e7b6c92a229
transaction
a81e8b1c456c7d1f6154daf07b622812f52e4ef6510afd6f17d7164f8707aa83
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 17085
recomputing…
the chainentry 17085
sealed to the entry before
af72ce18fe315f84d514c89fde300adac5d9cbeae0314ec3534f8bcb024f9bde
this leaf
63f90b14da00aa159feb152bd79eca1764e2127f45b33527b446da135d4b4b75
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
kRMm+OlLa8Up2RUJnYlwYpBHq4yuBdv7SBm+98h3pY5ZlodScINetHgVtIz8GcHgCkj7gOzth8LwVxw1HnwwAQ==