why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC3VA53BRRQZVW4TUPJKI4K73WZX7V7ZRJ7Q2RXVTR3AQ2WTG6HEUFVG, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC3VA53BRRQZVW4TUPJKI4K73WZX7V7ZRJ7Q2RXVTR3AQ2WTG6HEUFVG is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 59ed9ad6f8a5be9d71a665a32f543c37bc09fc703c87a3ed5e66de4038da709b
- request
- 1787ccb4f211d2bb03295eee1be473525ba678b2aaed9c08f8ebabe6d91e675b
- transaction
- f60e8e80f80f0b87c4334bc381d0e5ab403a438897b91031cacc2c490c4563f0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 412
the chainentry 412
- sealed to the entry before
- 159c55256a5542358be506161531a5908d19f62166e3a94e122f26a094065817
- this leaf
- 66499555125bfebd2b356f4df25e54e099d796c2e8c5fba6077e6723edb28b43
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- LlajnJWroUcavqf7wfMGtAP8Cmcl0VyNUQVTOKiqUIe5dwH1WERYKgBhizmjxeuKdMAz8zYSuaLnqUuNPUjsBQ==