why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCJBWSCTZSNEYTRDDAJBZ77VPQ5ASW2QCFWLLPEW7MJ7SFZW4N3RLM3N, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCJBWSCTZSNEYTRDDAJBZ77VPQ5ASW2QCFWLLPEW7MJ7SFZW4N3RLM3N is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- eb3a974912719a7c67d927cca3cf2d686a4f441e90b44d1dbfa1aa861e30f902
- request
- 81884f1637f4dfdfed41b44fc9318e8782146ac8c38e5a6f03c908c894bb02b9
- transaction
- 751d96f8bf063f0362af52c5b5248660afa583b52164aace5ca84dd21cc01326computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 67515
the chainentry 67515
- sealed to the entry before
- bfb560a3c851a27e1f4ad53fb2894a6ea69f40180bcc49c8102b8d525a2d01e8
- this leaf
- 67230c8b9447a08198825fed86b05ebe721c3d397cdd0935b978711268958301
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- NBkxDRRzqWxO0KDfmB+FvLR72lzRL7tvDsqXN/t0Luu+G4Xr/7UP7HAMEvXLMS895LtrNT6GO9rQ1rvDAYEWAg==