livelog 18,766 entries · root 75994b59ad8e · read 02:23:20
the record/entry 18609
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GANIMZQ4IJHS52N4SHSL6GOENAIPX4Y2W4GQBGGISTI3ASCLU5BE5C7E to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.956ms2026-08-22 23:32:27
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GANIMZQ4IJHS52N4SHSL6GOENAIPX4Y2W4GQBGGISTI3ASCLU5BE5C7E to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9ae9aa7f3b8be432c7a410a0c8f93a4f042fdf7cf38ffe6b4a3371abc54ef67b
request
9e137ed0ec3de651cc647829ba6a22eb1eb1d7c21e963eaacb728893298d2229
transaction
939856b22d483240a98f21bb11d5d152d4eb4ce041f80091d49b9273418dd919
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 18609
recomputing…
the chainentry 18609
sealed to the entry before
0048f2ac76a3709e17bed84c893150f53336af90e092f78c610ad0caaa359b75
this leaf
68a285f3c561770e97339c74e5930085583523112033096a9dee48846985740e
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
qYORglXNsAARuzQy20LRAlmT74PV6XR8y9B6C3Z8hg7XfhjXJxYTCSw5tRjgjP5SodQsiSHAUMlugNYZFc+/BQ==