why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDBHHFIPR4NYJMDSENU3UNVOKLJ3MZQMO46BFRFCP2ENAZFPZ3QB4FX5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- aed9eaedde40dddc2c5c0693481f923ed967a747ce0e5b92f09c8721c079ccaa
- request
- e1955ded200d7e082e1d1bc5d29905f001e58d11acc25f034eb4fc7b9e6d8087
- transaction
- d0c17022aae8cb8d757e8bab4569e2b41b826821ac73fa8775b058f9378bfdcacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 27555
the chainentry 27555
- sealed to the entry before
- d7d1c0cbf63f99c402a1f56634ed19199a5ac92a769a82ce78b56118d0b0b59e
- this leaf
- 6904eef9e8b711151d31ed03024dd90075fcc2c85b7ce893f6331ea61ef483fe
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 1lkeB6gNOwcgu0VRGm4a3l+DCgCuthJtDsskXH0FzitPtOFRmf29bznR4tKGZOYk117+JU1EhDk8f1CmsoDGAg==