why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBE5IWIP4VHOFE5XMWT6ZGXXTRPTSGKHPAP34CLY6LKG6J3TEY3DZBPY, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBE5IWIP4VHOFE5XMWT6ZGXXTRPTSGKHPAP34CLY6LKG6J3TEY3DZBPY is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8f2e0a1e5ef5a9d012eab6ba36187eb599ce23671715b1a159ed50277af9d81d
- request
- 9c6a2d8666bcf411dc94ca1b175e8aac04e23422c4a1de7d9a3544d06374df50
- transaction
- 0fa39a6beb1e008ff8789479d8fc6585f1500d4a1eae71f5fc21e5192146886acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 36855
the chainentry 36855
- sealed to the entry before
- f375f92be08db155daa54e742273e89d5301e8357e7b9c43b94e814dca87e8a7
- this leaf
- 6913218daddbba3235e9dc53abedf24f3c216662d346d8dd7899c41db1b872b3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- XVWAWQoHwjmWbX3hMIakO22E7whGE4HaJQAwwIyqlIp/LWuk/xfRJAphIsSB9dyiDjIY7gwc+7L+YCNWqb8jBQ==