why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBGRSQGF3BLJQGA67C4RA25RKRIJ3QNMFDVUWJ5AZKIAVPZ3XJWGQGDX, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBGRSQGF3BLJQGA67C4RA25RKRIJ3QNMFDVUWJ5AZKIAVPZ3XJWGQGDX is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f51cd01243dc6c5add7fb16274002340b4809137b12d6ba58ae72867b2f30ca6
- request
- 26de3eb1d3a413f446e5430ae8d61adcb4908565dbdc05f0c3b8c734c9550bff
- transaction
- 807d7deec939dca14cd1227bd2139f750d371b06583b0e308a2d0a86584b0fd4computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6728
the chainentry 6728
- sealed to the entry before
- c50dd45d1e9886fef46d402245a95aa72c5351aae6f029c0c34d529662cf125b
- this leaf
- 691f947eab578f7e13f7a3728c406003f4e3dafd8c9d9f4e6d688a3330dd0377
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- wZ5p22b6SdnhSXHwklMFHnRyiGa4IXiBN/9nYR0mm816ngChIHpw+XyeRLAGD6ARV0ltj9XR+kmMPm1HGPUUBg==