livelog 34,837 entries · root c010fa4abb63 · read 11:37:39
the record/entry 34710
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBPDHBENW55WLPT6AL5KUIQYMCYCRCG3OPQ4WYZU5C3PL46LWHPES5JT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.517ms2026-09-04 09:12:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBPDHBENW55WLPT6AL5KUIQYMCYCRCG3OPQ4WYZU5C3PL46LWHPES5JT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
bf9a78590c07d537c48bd6f5ac50478a3c9d4cbd069025669a841d228dfd7bf5
request
425f8c25cee181f738dc31ea0f853a46c378ebc83c54567a86230625ba2f2582
transaction
502fba40f650dfb0df365aa6ca9c66999ea43bc529a316076167f9b3d80a94fb
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 34710
recomputing…
the chainentry 34710
sealed to the entry before
358af98ca5f6151ee40b795c19179d979fb33823306ccd57ede45d50a1596e71
this leaf
693b62344d0031026ce88ffc24c43b0e1bbc3556bed324ca544a6a218c472735
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
e2C+Z565I2O7YEb5Dee2x7AfHyEuCjmyvFDqhBsd4rcw7xUMcPIoEVg5Ro8gtvEYPoph/2mJm/97cbi5rUe0Bw==