why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GC3RL4SE27VAB6UPP7XWW4L5RSX25RXXXCEANP43L65RI23JECDNQOIN to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b0434248f19b257ce08b40fc00cb3e7c084623b213d12381d9b0239a79250a69
- request
- e4103bdf5e1d7c23bdd9b6613495330c1573794c32e7e6d4ddcc3ad39d8e724d
- transaction
- 91fdd5ed123dadc1c13f7907dd7cc584b2d919f32db6d7852cdd59f4a3636bdbcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 42120
the chainentry 42120
- sealed to the entry before
- 51670831c72b6eb3f7c63e6a4b36b12b84016f5478b99ff073a1d07d3d73f009
- this leaf
- 699826a0919833a0640e8da8bb6eb21b82056ae06b552430388a0fb3858037f7
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- OQnHvd4l6VEJAcmL4Y7E4SjY0rrI3IFSt06PY0iyqG9VczAk7DNQXXOsGPwAfLpM5rJDm3I3U2oHLoFj1FcTCQ==