why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDBZ4ETALNE32TCOS7GA4KDLJOGQKMLMEKVUWOZZU55BXBUGCNGDNNGR, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDBZ4ETALNE32TCOS7GA4KDLJOGQKMLMEKVUWOZZU55BXBUGCNGDNNGR is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 82fef5a01d1398a3b845cf6f908a419cbc75d20f08226c55c7eb903f1ac5d8d1
- request
- 3c937a79b62231177f9dfa2a5ce94ae0e19560cbd875f24ccec73dc716b08523
- transaction
- 41c2ce2e60cd2d5d52ca193e0121e0bfc464a55d654dcb41364b5361e81d9724computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 29275
the chainentry 29275
- sealed to the entry before
- 8570872870930a4c24e43b45174c15694151d7e02cddb4c2ab8393ee0702d6db
- this leaf
- 6a0e3b0a8c47d1e5101fb8db228c7a8915b51afe73bd100fe07cb64e25a79af7
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- EzjoRyyBIUp56D4kdmqlU+t0Aqu8sCaWHbroDAPZg1cmaGGlz37UI2NRler3v7tV8qex7ONWDKE81ZUeiP3qCw==