why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GABR5EOCGI3IKCGWUI4GQDXEK3T6ANDKRDCRNROB47LBZP4HDO6XXPSF, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GABR5EOCGI3IKCGWUI4GQDXEK3T6ANDKRDCRNROB47LBZP4HDO6XXPSF is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 02afcf256a9e69444f17845b10be7fa5b0af2c9469d7e32f8e5fa9a8dfd83ca1
- request
- 6341a0fe5aa6c0d8d8b88cb413632fb3e1e7f404244c6c3246281cbb727a9ee8
- transaction
- e6d76a04a1cde5790205ffffb11fc5827abeaf2eca3e7be871354fa90268fe75computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20686
the chainentry 20686
- sealed to the entry before
- 66b8c721e9ff7667e4bafa8c54118d2e92a0cc11aa2812d3c9248b1ff940df14
- this leaf
- 6a266f49491af8cd9496e70b9c396014835c70108cc232d0f84cb4a9558260ee
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 3vy3UN2kHpwNSf+nNZIqbIj2SN/N7BtZkvkKu1/Ipj6XUvQQEFxSaK6BM53ppdxN+kk3j04wY8+Ikr+2AEmeAg==