why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBQM55NLH2M3XW2PBLZPLU3VKXBZDSXRYOCKPFWJU7NJW4SWFRHTRTWW to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a58e3a0f5c7d7af492d60fce2bcefeb95372acdcef7823e3fc8c462903a21c07
- request
- d9809929ce60de843933f5700953e4c3bb299757ac32c05fba72954c0d055c5b
- transaction
- e8c6e5313bc5c1e3182782512fa07e7e5cce553648638981ff07ef4007e8ce53computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 14601
the chainentry 14601
- sealed to the entry before
- 646e5ac10b54632381a037e2f8a6619d4216f579bfb4f09afc3a878de7982795
- this leaf
- 6a79df32d2f1b7ead5201ff85e750af653e05c81d7097c83565f7ae302c9f22d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- qQoZ6aA6fwqMGiYdgKfIh3Js/WPu/egsb6Wnrrkc2w3Rv0WXYTSFLs7QkNMuEjJ/a9bYsmFk1lviCxwEPVF4Dw==