why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GD2QXGQRJ5SIVKZ34D3YNAGGRI54366EWFXYQRDQSK4ZQAGLQYSM7XFA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6650c2b9143814c830e1c9d99b1e500bfd53c56f755f190d586eba955cda0eac
- request
- e8efb2c3c8dfb313b3526967e28196abedd7a433f82182631c9910f6324e0121
- transaction
- 831e0a3d2ba8e6be588b36f17c251baf54a9f484b531c350c6f44cf98a44804bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28725
the chainentry 28725
- sealed to the entry before
- 52a61eb1fd894042e175edb1c93357ddf4bb115038c7b65b3693f37882d5978c
- this leaf
- 6aca4a3edffb0a913b1cbcd670ea8a78d8a72a92a165e99d4a91aa839a48989f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- fMy8io8PvTPWA3PkYxkmtnLYgs1T3Zr3lBwFYDc9UHotWdZA65whg3hRUhyLsrLwhY38v7MhzeRlJ67OFBP/Aw==