livelog 31,405 entries · root 04d25541cbfd · read 20:40:44
the record/entry 30547
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBJTSIAQIQHDWASAWW2TNT23G4PTF3DO6THE52U2SBXQSBDRTOPYLNHH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.593ms2026-09-01 04:47:33
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBJTSIAQIQHDWASAWW2TNT23G4PTF3DO6THE52U2SBXQSBDRTOPYLNHH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
3716816e75e70d346a4b57e5edcbffcfbb65187acada317949c95690ca94f327
request
09d8e361ed3ebfee82fdf953482ef6a0af9d30ada9a44ad74a01b0d1289e0284
transaction
6a06e64e777416f898b6315a8b38668d472b676214b5d475e7e84ab70bff97ba
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30547
recomputing…
the chainentry 30547
sealed to the entry before
f72fc8040b3e0fc1162f10f07147c51fcc9b919259368bb335cdbcb581403aac
this leaf
6b48962f7dd18bdfd04f1d67e43796aec873e4dd5a4f3cc17b473434744bdbc9
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
dxAddM52Vl2BEOewr09tDCEocjB0QNoD9MPxKpBzi4LrHn1NahgOqV6nUEutqDCFviaOmVJstOcPZB70vt35Cw==