why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAKC4U7VP5OYZSBUB3ZSOO5FJIQLKSW6PRO7SS2NQDKXXWZNF7IXSRZY to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8e073339b700731b508776421a244c769920b22fa092c97801e14d2e7f2664e3
- request
- 9e515fade3b9d6002e1e2517acfc0e23e429096998a3b0f51557d5222b920131
- transaction
- 70fa9b5361ab3ed12f075b6275a8cd2f423a6f3122e737673ae05e440e171b2bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 13570
the chainentry 13570
- sealed to the entry before
- b0da771224ee1eb886220c16ca4da1f2758d3296fa5e4e9fca61bf5214087ba5
- this leaf
- 6b71bcca768215b52e4e016cb8b3fff08f8e1f9e2a95d31b755ee0bffd0fbc35
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- oZF6zphjAKV/pFjxee1rQMDwUDtHd8rKpcjyotYHI6ALE5hRcuE87EfmruHr2FhhSU6/1U0CA0NwlsvQjT1eBA==