why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB5IJJN4ECM2SRNLUTADE7QWXIXPIUJEHGWWGUABM3K4LVNLCAE55T3B, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB5IJJN4ECM2SRNLUTADE7QWXIXPIUJEHGWWGUABM3K4LVNLCAE55T3B is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d8ec53050ac43aabc548c4e8be1792505d0fecbaf1a13673d3d4b3bc7343c050
- request
- 0b51d16030c16cd010e51e1be3786e4b0a2755b459de9b3bb96f9dcab641f740
- transaction
- 4854acb4c7392d4b32529453cc6f767a7d2c4ba4edec92b3b3392f206071ddeacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 26002
the chainentry 26002
- sealed to the entry before
- 5930a008c9ab8e1807148a702765688d667928318e700a0d9c06451d373c0dc4
- this leaf
- 6c0810a5a5eab8717effec324ad9f7e686c5a493dfcb4e49d48d5f5e2c6f586c
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- mwwdBwgTuJCHnaBnzKQS7LV7NrcOc1KuMcrGtkTXQt9lIzdvGgenVa3UdvaXg6VEglDk2slufwq4/j1iDBMvCg==