why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBJGWPLZFQKQPQF4DHUVQODD6W6DPPMI2AFBJU6SVVP47ZNIG264UUSC, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBJGWPLZFQKQPQF4DHUVQODD6W6DPPMI2AFBJU6SVVP47ZNIG264UUSC is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e016418e6781c8943e030c449d25ded6f050eb4d15b7942fba82f69eeee15176
- request
- 0a468a6394dcde3241bed9ac121aad79a4ae2bd6ec5bfa5b038885f7d58a122e
- transaction
- a532042ea6ddb3158becf1fbea18d6e42185c1b6d0f8a808c150e83c9f575bf7computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 72662
the chainentry 72662
- sealed to the entry before
- 890b67fa11b49976c8f62653d5b949c6b5331a9d7018c36b4fa002fd0f6b671b
- this leaf
- 6c62bd29b18e6c0ffb003eefb5b084f291445eedccfaa3dfad295462753fbf4a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- AobW68sA4qDf4IlV6msw+U85QBSuOTDDW/FykYYtkFeFVYcVe52ZCy7NLYYGovw2qvBayJt3DXwc4CS1aBmWAA==