why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAQFGGFQSX3ZDC5YMKCW4RL2Z4Q3KKXVYIV7PZIGO6RKJBP75BQLQCTB, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAQFGGFQSX3ZDC5YMKCW4RL2Z4Q3KKXVYIV7PZIGO6RKJBP75BQLQCTB is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c7e4e8fed6fe17bdf707a9fedff24ee310095f1c7bbfb1620dc62bd43ceed8dc
- request
- 43b507894c259f392e3019a10453d81e642b7c6d268f090ccdf9e5bc9b636153
- transaction
- 218054302799d0480cd1015bcff31f148d7baaedc15eafd8f89177effa5cab5acomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 56659
the chainentry 56659
- sealed to the entry before
- 7c7bc3209070a46c3807c5e635c5c8fefec2a7c9562e0f53b97f697a4a335e94
- this leaf
- 6c7f83ba73007a66d6b2a8d0c31d8731f4eecd75a2545a991736bb908593f6ea
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- Kt4/XC788c0BFhacugFqrKnEtABbEzJnOciTNVaiucrRKpYxnJFTobPapsDkagcJyc9wtFlEts0aGDak9vN8AA==