why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAT4Q63NLJ64462E4L7OY4EBL6BGOVTVKBX4WFXZVPEGZZEHG76PWS2O to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 574f9badaeb2cd9af6fe8f22f1bb6d5b91ed904b15a580bfdbd44bb713b6edce
- request
- fbcc6e669c0343bada8d752067966c8e4a0d9f923c704198933cdb5fe993dc16
- transaction
- 6c948719f3fafccec2200ccd4eb6fb509f5b7f26dca1f2f2d6c8d3856c805abfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 19044
the chainentry 19044
- sealed to the entry before
- 67cb152454170cde6c77e0a07f2c14bea0f7d3e7dcfe10ecfd2ca1a256942699
- this leaf
- 6d2414d9a5400810b7c0b8940334c6e62c7a59e1519865a5251d2476b0464cae
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- xbPhSaZ53S67MaQcKYiU53ExAZT8xxQPXpaRSY+dvKVhIpYYSfQFycjP5mYrPXCT/ziIic+hbvctPht9HLGJBw==