livelog 21,222 entries · root 4a213930e27f · read 00:03:28
the record/entry 19630
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GANGGHYCET2XT43C773XUKCAXSTOCAR2XJIWSTFRTSOAULXTKR7BK53V to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.031ms2026-08-23 18:37:30
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GANGGHYCET2XT43C773XUKCAXSTOCAR2XJIWSTFRTSOAULXTKR7BK53V to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
4b997ceda433dab4cc61d1358f1a0ac1f124568d10b1ce0489422e1ed5b73bc2
request
f00b9af736a06b3f4b73667280183d919b25dd1a75ba150a83df1333d930dcc3
transaction
f0180698964642707ef3d46c4906c99caffe228b3ed10320f001a1a661a311f9
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 19630
recomputing…
the chainentry 19630
sealed to the entry before
324ecb679d4bdacfabda26025d8083d2fffc142230b97b7c53c82eff8f3df473
this leaf
6d8b2e81483c85bad3bbf418d7779d0e0cdcd2d256b7f51dd10c0a5897c80c2a
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
aHr13XSVIxIqejaYv8w7LwQ/vGSzJi7LhGfUGjQtu9y+BmAdgRhu4jPb4FaJJOMwfFnfSzG05maZ3kS1BEteDQ==