livelog 11,548 entries · root 8c1dae567e20 · read 11:12:33
the record/entry 6585
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDC4PDX3HAYS7ILNZEEO4L6UGAPGSHJUKII7P2RCFBXMVDDM7VHQP5WU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.744ms2026-08-13 14:17:23
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDC4PDX3HAYS7ILNZEEO4L6UGAPGSHJUKII7P2RCFBXMVDDM7VHQP5WU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
1ad6c1c92e0d2de6f2783838a8b652074ed43d321316bf56494e909d492431cc
request
f1183bbee62fd247df6179ae66bf86fd8dcfe611fb7e6022d323b47fbacf2dff
transaction
8216beaa9b4ccff3ed0a6b10d9945389bf4305206c00777d7a86a656549a6576
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6585
recomputing…
the chainentry 6585
sealed to the entry before
65d678e26ab454a5737c882018947b9b376dac466fb6e95750f09f376087ff19
this leaf
6db778c2df138befdfe5a1a30f9715905181dd8e0453e89af771458986ff2ae9
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
i7K7DtcZiuU51OCv3RH2kFSsPmTnur4VnN+RCmGYkM4Bn0umXhyAH40FNxkUTHGQsZGsAOjcZEnIvoyqU5wzCA==