why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBHC7ZJDFABC5TKL3C24ZZLMLQCAS3FMBWAWLO27BKUQCVFHEVRWUYMO to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 897ddafb82807d27b73fafc5e22bc850fcb6eb9138e0cec1d4261ea285bc1684
- request
- 47a79bcf3e9b90095cc3f6a6506692d2c5613d26dbe8800a65a453cebf2ac8db
- transaction
- f5b901ced124c9e0838347ae92530cde7e382530c367c2321ee3b8991ad1bb1fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 10189
the chainentry 10189
- sealed to the entry before
- 491f63fe60e26e91d8ba87774616b4d051e53eeda77492bc7f10f7b79924e0e5
- this leaf
- 6e5c8358a6980b7c038dce40a99ecc8a90cdcd0ef26bca58c6a69bcd281bbd80
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- BNF2vZUzpnQ+a3cLb7VFq9tgcaZ8V/H+tefpYhdW9MdLJ2jm9xjbXU5hK25N5yhQmQEX3v04SNbQ7shPkxO+CQ==