livelog 22,193 entries · root 9e7a95f87c37 · read 18:12:42
the record/entry 20779
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBLBKC22ET6UPCJPTZLUHXWS7GTYCPJB6ATOSLOQM7OCMMHOPX27GEUI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.390ms2026-08-24 15:42:32
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBLBKC22ET6UPCJPTZLUHXWS7GTYCPJB6ATOSLOQM7OCMMHOPX27GEUI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
108e2a2981a6efa9c98d67ba270f3273bb87a9ad553f1fd55fd527ea00bb0d7a
request
85444461ee790262c3270ad14931d027cc0f91eb4f8267faa8f8e435e5f894d1
transaction
f53570649eb1efe89d6d3f2a45a8a6567f606c1d7c7e6b5b714392a168a67b00
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20779
recomputing…
the chainentry 20779
sealed to the entry before
bcb26951778af66da59fc5a6586991400efe644d481c789f1fd372cf2a8efd3c
this leaf
6fa557b469a99f5e906ea552bdff689c637fa097e8fbd60f5dd019eddfa6dccb
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
fMBAeGwlfYAO44yjFAxWVhuOL011e2JZ8xn5Zg20HHeIpmx0NU0uKtLq8Nuz6n575902g7LwimZOhuJOocw6CA==