why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCQ5XHYS4EYPHYUCOI2J3FCSOW63KQ34XSQDH23XBETXX6TJA26VN7Z7 to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 067b07e49881f742c81dd138c613fecbc1fa3af9d5641eb1f752c5a51cf775cc
- request
- 7bded260bc0993efea05479a879be38fbf14ca51d9ac56e57ef4210fca4745d2
- transaction
- c5820702e8e38a5936db4649098cbc1b30a74b882d5d47d2c6406d1ea9064dbfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 4872
the chainentry 4872
- sealed to the entry before
- c037fece8e111266ab844f229d39030bcd24f7f27be2003495133a1dea605188
- this leaf
- 7002041a45a94e2fa6e77e4bacbfdde42def2db702166d0633fdcb31b8bbee32
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- r+MtBJGAlSPn0BmJk4muEPnNIP/WxxoVIDf3FQPXNE9Pvb2SC9sxjZ7BmmcdcqHrJ+/nHMG4jfP7twuPLtL4DA==