livelog 57,354 entries · root 84f96b33750c · read 13:09:47
the record/entry 57214
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBOQUXQ3AFPYI3PVS4PTPAFNEDSDO6ZPI2AROYZCIYKUYRBZE7GQMME3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.057ms2026-09-21 11:06:13
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBOQUXQ3AFPYI3PVS4PTPAFNEDSDO6ZPI2AROYZCIYKUYRBZE7GQMME3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
768dcfc67667979c815f91be6bfc143744e4c36eba2349f06574b624bb520a45
request
63411790d87e265de6e110e63a6e98c162830880aaa0790574eb8825e65ea7ba
transaction
958841f170006bbc2fa2644ec164237d4685c7d67f7ad1acff99199f9b2e5391
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57214
recomputing…
the chainentry 57214
sealed to the entry before
5687c23c31dbb221c544f1052af26518016ec631e391de92d69ab8add58798eb
this leaf
7008ff278ef8c795d37dbd7de68ea019181058129bd264a4acd6a4579b416d2d
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
vQP8me9jUNXrgzgvscRmHP9lQcd7SvzF9hi+u+69zUxyznoYrZJkEdfVwBgY8NgXfQUe1tWlNUDqEtdb2yxtCw==