why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA3NXG6JZ2U2JMGO3QXJ4VLFK3E7DOF34LULZUSRDWEOA6G5NYMHU6ZF, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GA3NXG6JZ2U2JMGO3QXJ4VLFK3E7DOF34LULZUSRDWEOA6G5NYMHU6ZF is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7940491fd4bcce0994e9ed2c1e7d9f0500bea75a408bcdedf6ec860fe44aa53a
- request
- bbe06f516e80764db97fe4e33cfdef5c767660293b26bfe3da9eee052ff58b9c
- transaction
- 1cd63044db8270ab7256ccf058b1b91383f73bc9ea9bcf18d997f0a41f9e51a5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 52835
the chainentry 52835
- sealed to the entry before
- a774c6c8ed9d9a89af5a0daefb59e39257345366b79f01f070a91ebdcfc02f7f
- this leaf
- 70b1b74787fab000a060bb6783f553d3110d458a61c20d1325fcdc6ddb20cd49
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- q8d59dbpfLCrkfghRntriJZxW0J5KtBZDdry5ZDmeD8GhU1jNTF3bOn+WcM1ly2YgLP9SpEGzB/4oxsu6ukLAw==