why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBH23TN4K6MLRAODRH7FTE24FUP4434RCT5TXTHRZEOEKAQEN5PQDDMD to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b150fb0e6c917bcfb8caa341682bec4054b28de599b099763c792fd5d362c734
- request
- 257dcf5c831fddbe97d9b31ff344ec999e4af2e99b9de17f5b8cec5b602825d9
- transaction
- 27857490fbeca2ce07a78f6c0cba2cc99e7abb030ef1caf88acb13700acd6e4ccomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 74067
the chainentry 74067
- sealed to the entry before
- 59d2afec6fabd472e83e734a53d196f6a674707e6258daf3fa1b1a2943e915ca
- this leaf
- 757a45f95310f215a4d16ded1be188a1570fd5f019bb0dcc4b63a164a5292b1f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 4KSaYiHn5ISG5su8CEI2CIZNLttvRmbf/+FHSTnTrf78BqJPYt3MGwwuVQMraaqmClZzAVUXBya5hAeRAuUdBg==