why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDZO3Q6BQN7ZPTURQXE5JMIER2TFNK2X66RDWGE5G5YJRB4DOK5H5MCY to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 91f70a769e920922b9a434bcfe9f1150ffbeac7ab702528d21907ba772f56659
- request
- b927a1aca9c8a12dab561ad00c5b8c71d4f1d249b68bfb5df34cbd1a4dac9fed
- transaction
- e28043811feade068361419e732ce98491fa1013b066b1510cc9e4968959d0b3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 49442
the chainentry 49442
- sealed to the entry before
- aab1b08c6576d49f7af7a535a982c7a65c86db300396e43ff5241bc00b6744dd
- this leaf
- 776555c4a270522234b50d2cf6b3167d5efce4ba6c262b8fe36d822ba23b265f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- HZRbFQdBuiIqzrRS+4SICK5DZosxYhDL6uBeTVhkh1PomZyKMPFHhLtR8l7p6UjTcIuXLJeFUITd3frKjvD/Aw==