why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCFHZ2K4YHQ5DSTCTDRXG4ZOOD7IBAKPPX3XM6ZN7XPXSDSQINRJS2LL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 60c5c49c54fba3cca631ef6c8dbba34b0c576d1a279c747b837c139d91b10481
- request
- 6686449f8fdd3eb6f3d20d85bd48f56e470e30ad778f4b7e698ff346ffc5a085
- transaction
- 75011899b361e5640d324c5c02ad3d7873657fbe910318a2a037078bb8b07830computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 32168
the chainentry 32168
- sealed to the entry before
- 46dc7f69fd8d253ff281426d9f75a50619f5fceac0c0dd9673d30c3a3577c4d0
- this leaf
- 77e3dda20e1b0126860916bfe7c14581b3f3170828a049c5adf52ba268935d3a
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +BEZU4MJ7XHJ3wUu0+iGixfIybMHLzp07XeK6zC4znXA4EfN0OMjUPAG0pCda4HZQirwXL53C7oEWLnsum0lDA==