livelog 13,677 entries · root 9ac84bb90aaa · read 02:52:49
the record/entry 3696
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAR3KH3UXCCONT7RC673ZDP2CNJ5I7WOGCEQHJH6QN7S52JDUNUOMTKH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 5.272ms2026-08-11 06:52:24
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAR3KH3UXCCONT7RC673ZDP2CNJ5I7WOGCEQHJH6QN7S52JDUNUOMTKH to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
856bbdefe7643b0af4cba0a40e1067adb84fa643a3e0dce17b33af6f85f33842
request
79c01566148bc9cbc8a8080e38f063ac6a5e5bd9336f3cda59fa647ba95c27f7
transaction
7400678c8974266098d64c98bef5ea05705ef2e22a024c39e6530b61f3d7ffe9
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3696
recomputing…
the chainentry 3696
sealed to the entry before
6468cc9996a8ae8bf5ac64e71954d72581ffeeb1718fd6406d838737ecc3141a
this leaf
782a1df2350c167122e8ab8597e94deadf8f73701287ce666e6836978307c63a
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
kC47x2FgWmMqloGZdo6g1mtOtsnKcMiFRYO6Hcakc5ojBs96jkAEkyOIq1mbgAq3Qp/QrhyRUlyFCvudhPofBg==