livelog 42,985 entries · root 56d8d3c3676b · read 19:50:39
the record/entry 41774
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GB34KP56UZQX3325Q2QE2IFC7MVXZSREFYA5KEL4ZQXQR5CMJXR2SKUM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.681ms2026-09-09 21:25:03
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GB34KP56UZQX3325Q2QE2IFC7MVXZSREFYA5KEL4ZQXQR5CMJXR2SKUM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
3343aae1dd95a8044fbf9db955d40e71cbce3cb7252768d8ee9a7b422d1fe271
request
c8da1ecdf281407d097bca9da1ad91e83f93ab53eb131693fa1a1a1517da27ad
transaction
bd9a0f1f98497a964f2b2b12b798968f668877d25537d466bc2ef4ba5c9f3dca
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 41774
recomputing…
the chainentry 41774
sealed to the entry before
7060f4d488c746d4674c101fe301bca887e6d1a47b71c72388f11dc2ee6ac6e4
this leaf
78598f3f22b41700016e45e61526896ce12b644f0ce9b9cc728069a6f2a302d0
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
FdL8c3SixVA9+3o2UQdpvxYGyXpZDCixQd+cdXARmjYxh1pqAuVcNRiTiTag6v/fxA2PLxniUX5N4m/Tvi1vAg==