why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA63DAQXAYLMKSM3ZBRGVQKBJT4HDLV5INWWD25GJF3DN3ELOSU76PGP, which is not in the allowlist
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 700.0000000, cap is 500
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 94966833094fe79497c08636727381e72e065b3fbb486566897f71aa3a2feb05
- request
- 2589768464fcbac091756b64fe01109184f22f5c7c4b85fb784f8c006906458b
- transaction
- 3b4d5129c6fbc6e090f2b0171adce13e203e62895aef21e07232bd63ac15f9b2computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57289
the chainentry 57289
- sealed to the entry before
- 554d1a20e1df27ccfe5a108f0f0867d292867a263bbff158d26e10c074259b90
- this leaf
- 789eb8acb96d6c397f7960714dce68e23a442ed90aaa8aede4a186c98b55cbdf
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- qqrEnzsWlXeHbOTySeJk+AAbTePTg0DcsjNEKC+/OfqP1mwkD8oF4TfkfpxAFsMX6xx8kdbSnqEqlvnpCaUeBA==