why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GA63ZEAT3N5WXA4HRN3KS77KAF6DJBVT4LIOQFBMSO5CKTSQWP5WZU6J, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GA63ZEAT3N5WXA4HRN3KS77KAF6DJBVT4LIOQFBMSO5CKTSQWP5WZU6J is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 859abe559e3e9369d54a0446cf251ad0907c788e4093fb328715f629e79d5045
- request
- 5b8209f0a20db04c6a30fff778271b717d17eb2c184b0b82e6ccdf7d21dcbd00
- transaction
- 2770c9405de784e2deaa928075d8c585c797dbe3578ee8ed7795c635e9e9f379computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 9577
the chainentry 9577
- sealed to the entry before
- 3e55f9ed9fde50032929225779fa1abe79bcaee736088b6dbe1d354a1ab8b370
- this leaf
- 78c6902c50cb4f24c2b0c5191e0fde8f15a8d56a41e6a1c7934f7d9bb09f40df
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- p2kipcYlAXgQX1cF5eHSV4woa12WQGKB97ABzWioluWwtAJA3rOf97kRq0iEXdLFTK+H1r9cM48NWiZ2heL1BA==