why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBYKJ2WS5R4B7FNQ3SW25BQCPUTPE2KPNYO7BYW6Q7E64QB372WQBJTL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1c25977dc633fbc6edcb6662d601612b743f691f11a37e9d6f2208abbf28fbb1
- request
- 667e91eba6fae6de89c51e73dcec42fc40232a1af13bff3feaa7e8534b1c6b99
- transaction
- 8ae41473445f5417e8ab50f58f0a34a335ae75d51826ea1824102a72e04909d5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 41634
the chainentry 41634
- sealed to the entry before
- 99cbd86095b2e0fba9c49f7630a58a570b3f2a9b9ffb9393545f643a1a1efbc2
- this leaf
- 78dfce01f05aa7099c1d2ab2eb2711b0be25c2917bab579fcb5bb43b27bc85fc
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- yUpTm97b6pu/GGL5SFEgLTPjZbNXCcHIwPActgC9LP7oCY9/KwICZsudIZVTiLR6jRYVDjbbXwDRqFZrrvd0Cg==