livelog 31,564 entries · root e754877faefd · read 23:28:05
the record/entry 30833
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCWR7PHD3JXOWDJA2P5KC3TMMGHLMGVYX2O5OXAT6I4IZS5BWOLXKCAZ to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.624ms2026-09-01 10:12:34
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCWR7PHD3JXOWDJA2P5KC3TMMGHLMGVYX2O5OXAT6I4IZS5BWOLXKCAZ to 30 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
7f4419c33be24d2ed3dbeedc50f55f1030dbeb79255548b77714493ff5a0c503
request
f40c01bf3304ad682f1dafc20d2bee0f264c1019142b8d94d0c92c4e1f992a7c
transaction
d93e7871accfed0332e0c70269f3d2e514641da62636c641f28aa719b912d34b
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30833
recomputing…
the chainentry 30833
sealed to the entry before
42216d846240d111516b74d04bde583e569fcf9b343d44846fb33d55a8e59944
this leaf
794a259d7089736c627110176d150c2c66177d3febe336ac1d1e94e6922aae54
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
ZZM6mXykRtkpNetVesukFlhs+39Gaaf5DuiHE7EwHGWCVAl4nQVMTK0KRQWVUWuDygicIPDuD53xEmkEy2i9DQ==