why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAKCF5P4EVLRTWVMYNSUNQEEVE65PTJ2FCAQIAXJF7EKF7ZFTWRRS23H, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GAKCF5P4EVLRTWVMYNSUNQEEVE65PTJ2FCAQIAXJF7EKF7ZFTWRRS23H is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 6aa46d8fba2e81795a1e62dbf39af72f8e56b35b7efd92a407714b08f78ae5a1
- request
- ece7bb0b4a65bf8d035d4ab29056e3c63a8aab9c655b4ee9c13d450957d27e33
- transaction
- a4489f8b4dfa6e0c8765f0041a327f5df6b1f2505e882e9f1ac324165d7fbe79computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 852
the chainentry 852
- sealed to the entry before
- 9b5fd9a91b5885a1b7ba746e1c3141e56db37db380df82e25c746a487d8b4a3e
- this leaf
- 7af30c461e4a99be878cdc2137041e796d9a784ad62ecfd4a02b8b267b43cc3f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- GJmJ5/ZSW4eQcBJZDKfVxt5q5b+33R/XyQVoOTV16EPxAN+S2VLSYGVxFFZoATPxBOjPleS0gUI4sx3DfG6mAQ==