why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCWP72YRZ5HEYQGZNLM3CLKSOO6AHSD6GY4FUJVKRTWTKZG4U4OPR5AI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a6343a829f98725fcc4673621156b49a1df1cb58add14bb34fa8d673fbaf2550
- request
- ac2f47948c89892b633be88710c2454b0f6e19a29f1613ae4c0ec6ddfdaed0e9
- transaction
- 57ba21bd7d7f159fe96c6ab3cba5d42c14e923dae883ef1331cc8438d7223a2fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 30625
the chainentry 30625
- sealed to the entry before
- 1b84c0028400267d9a0f26b67ea267f9d7840ebd07eb07ac021d054171c95d28
- this leaf
- 7e49718c94b4f34b51f1570af5ec7b9726d89f9c226d5a97e83e9d6b95dd91ee
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- YnI2OhElCrK0fhn5Y17fkgFAhc90rOFfXYi+yXyVey43pPdXKhGuxB11tecmQkUd/eSv/jEzxbo946dCzBt7BQ==