why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQ7FDQLTECKKFZTHSEIXPX4OTCPRLGIHYGWWV77FTBSWODTK6GWKDY3 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 03fa4d452e9524ffd6b243e931b29c4da3dab70682fb6551f6cf68c8e12d5f3b
- request
- 231e7b8ecfc68ce9a70732e8c7cf5599d4c66d04f0f51119b887847550fc5773
- transaction
- 05c9219c1fa2f61061aaa06b78b3193acbc94499d3f3b30ef8ab31145fb39f28computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 9807
the chainentry 9807
- sealed to the entry before
- 60629a5dd6c848ee83b5798a0943752939df9ff14371243c4eaa0346ef44a31f
- this leaf
- 7e4d40705653464ec80b7adfc5d07f836f0e4ae8fc499bd9bbc962978aee1bc0
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- oKxNToPqLs04Ya1fO/uX0lvDIoXda7Vw218WilKuvTi0Tmi3xPLbhwPOsQ+9qye4w6r5xTMxJc+tWIJGpVOZDw==