livelog 18,082 entries · root 5c98208af830 · read 13:34:03
the record/entry 17688
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GD4A5QTN7TH3JZBORD7RZWHXBGDAICBMJU43HU4BOLUGGWNUH72462NU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.973ms2026-08-22 06:07:27
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GD4A5QTN7TH3JZBORD7RZWHXBGDAICBMJU43HU4BOLUGGWNUH72462NU to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
7c9c99426e41eb740a0338bcdffeba5681676421bfec13dfe6ebe79d23846f26
request
f55cd8d4b03097b8c6e662c03e6d5ec685a068774f2c776a883f9967b9618f8d
transaction
656c07d8834d0c9fb1b44ab2b4765940ab7c538cdeed8c3c6c15eb00ce82b940
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 17688
recomputing…
the chainentry 17688
sealed to the entry before
f3e0a09d17a81d7586ef3497e594ca54a689c17db26626963c839101ead0bb28
this leaf
7f784fe713686be05b400a69f43114cb6439c18376d8cfb131f3e532925ea13e
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
X49N9WrB1kwSOp+DBI9IBDQbaNDPOmN/MG8ec+T0cPVrB8ZaTKX3XD5CFlgpRBtj/rNrLzbN8tzP6uS1g/TKBQ==